Child pornography blocking again
kraktus at googlemail.com
Sat Jan 26 22:31:03 UTC 2008
On 26/01/2008, F. Fox <kitsune.or at gmail.com> wrote:
> Kraktus wrote:
>> On 25/01/2008, F. Fox <kitsune.or at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Kraktus wrote:
>>>> On 25/01/2008, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
>>>>>> I just want to know if there is a technically feasible way of
>>>>> Use your brain. Packets have no EVIL bit to test for.
>>>> I'm pretty sure my suggestion is better than an RFC April Fools' Joke.
>>> Hehe, I like that: RFC for the EVIL bit. Designed to stop all manner of
>>> online crime. =xoD
>> Really, if I'd known my message was going to evoke this sort of response,
>> I'd have entitled it 'Directory-distributed variables for exit lists'.
> Oh come on... you can't tell me you didn't get a chuckle at the idea of
> an EVIL bit. =:oD
It is somewhat difficult to have a sense of humour when people are
saying that you are the cancer killing Tor, a troll, a vigilante, that
your mother and wife are witches, etc. But thanks for trying.
More information about the tor-talk