Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)

[F. Fox]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Roger Dingledine wrote:
(snip)
> (It's unclear what anonymity impact this might have, but it might be
> substantial: if a lot of our potential paths through the network involve
> a slow link, and we discard all those potential paths, that would make
> a big difference. On the other hand, that's exactly the point.)
(snip)

Sounds like we have ourselves a conundrum, and a tradeoff. =:oD

- --
F. Fox
AAS, CompTIA A+/Network+/Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=C+MP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----