[OT] Off-topic posts

Kyle Williams kyle.kwilliams at gmail.com
Thu Aug 21 17:31:23 UTC 2008


On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:13 AM, <phobos at rootme.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:12:32PM +0200, sven at anderson.de wrote 0.6K
> bytes in 22 lines about:
> : Tor-related are marked with [OT] in the subject. I think this is the
> : least we can do for those who are just interested in the Tor stuff, so
> : they can filter/skip those mails.
>
> I vote for just kicking people off the list.  While this may feed into
> their fascism/censorship fantasies, dropping the signal to noise ratio
> doesn't help anyone search the archives nor get their questions
> answered.
>
> Kicked people are welcome to rejoin so long as they can keep their
> posts relevant to technical details of tor, onion routing
> research, and subsequent discussions.
>
> There are plenty of places, that are not here, to discuss the global
> cabal, licensing facts and opinions, mail user agent etiquette, and
> future alien overlords from the Crab Nebula.  If you can't find these
> places, start with usenet.
>
> My $0.02; not that of the Tor Project.
>
> --
> Andrew
>


I agree.  The noise on this mailing list is making my eyes bleed when I want
to know what is going on with Tor.
To be honest, I haven't read much of the mailing list since for the last
couple weeks because of all the noise.
We I open an e-mail from the Tor mailing list, I expect it to be about Tor
or Tor related technologies, not 9/11 conspiracies.

I say ask them politely to stop, if not, kick'em off.

- Kyle
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20080821/e542e97f/attachment.htm>


More information about the tor-talk mailing list