Like to run TOR-Node

[Wilfred L. Guerin]

The only way to determine the integrity of their policy or claims is to
contest it.

There are many options to where you implement such a system, but if you can
control the logistics of your implementation it gives you a very good entry
point into your profession ;)

However, the basis of TOR is a known set of authorized entities, the receipt
of the DHT by definition (including liability) by the machine under your
control makes the said list a known and authorized set. This could imply
that authority is also liable for transactions on other nodes by conspiracy
or intent to associate, but also provides a weakened vulnerability to
logistic attacks from those claiming your access model (known nodes and
REGISTERED machines) is open or loose.

Your best option, in any case, is to test it! (maximal loss is 1 month
service fee?)

-Wilfred
WilfredGuerin at Gmail.com







On 9/14/07, Ricky Fitz <calypso at satyr.ath.cx> wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Schieder:
>
> > You're the law student, you tell us :-)
>
> Well no, im just a student, now a lawyer ;-)
> Thats why I sent this mail to ask for experiences.
>
> > But I agree that it can be extended to Tor/Open Proxies, even
> 'knowingly'
> > running vulnerable software that allows people to send spam over your
> > SMTP server. Basically, it can be extended to say: You may not have any
> > service running on your server.
> > And that's where I think the argumentation is void.
>
> Of course, you are right in that case. But otherwise: Do you really
> believe they are writing this for people who let other anonymous people
> use there shell? I have a little doubt ...
>
> > In the end, it's a matter of interpretion.
>
> Of course, that will probably be my job the rest of my live ;-)
>
> Thanks,
> Ricky.
> --
> "Falls Freiheit überhaupt etwas bedeutet, dann bedeutet sie das Recht
> darauf, den Leuten das zu sagen, was sie nicht hören wollen."
> - George Orwell, aus dem Nachwort zu "Animal Farm", 1945 -
>
> GPG-Fingerprint: 10D6 7B8F 1F7C 7CB1 2C4E 930E AFD2 FDF3 A10B D302
> GPG-Key-ID: AFD2FDF3A10BD302
> http://www.lawlita.com/pgp-schluessel/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20070914/094f45b7/attachment.htm>