20090101

[Martin Senftleben]

Am Freitag, 9. November 2007 schrieb Eugen Leitl:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:42:46PM +0100, Valen MacLeod wrote:
> >    Heisst das jetzt, dass ich das protokollieren muss, wenn ich
> > einen TORserver betreiben will?
>
> Not yet. A lot of things can and will change until 1. January 2009,
> and I would definitely look for an official legal interpretation
> before you pick between your three choices of what to do (or not to
> do).
>
> What are the most friendly jurisdications for anonymizing services?
> I was thinking about Russia, but it's probably not cheap to rent
> a server there. Any russian Tor operators here?

The Germans on this list can participate in a Verfassungsbeschwerde 
(constitutional complaint?) here:

http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/content/view/51/70/

Martin
-- 
Dr. Martin Senftleben, Ph.D. (S.V.U.)
http://www.drmartinus.de/
http://www.daskirchenjahr.de/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20071110/9b703c7e/attachment.pgp>