Security Focus story

[Eugen Leitl]

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:37:58AM +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:

> If TOR would legally qualify as an ISP, we're in deep trouble.

We don't provide access to the Internet, and we're not charging
for it. Last time I looked the data retention laws also allowed
a loophole for very small providers.

> Keyword: the upcoming data-retention laws in Europe.

Even if you ran a Tor node with logging, and you gave
BKA a slice for the time window they ask you for, that
would be quite useless. 

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820            http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20070309/dc7cc08d/attachment.pgp>