A different solution for anonymous browsing !

[gabrix]

Taka Khumbartha wrote:

> gabrix @ 2006/11/16 04:28:
>
> >I invite everyone , who is trying , tryed or is actually applying a
> >chain of proxies for browsing,like manies  one after the other  , or
> >unusual  proxies configurations  for anonymous browsing different from
> >the usual tor/privoxy duo,socat,anonweb,polipo,squid,wwwoffle, to let me
> >know .... thanks !
>
> i'm not sure why you are wanting to do this.  but, if you are trying 
> to be "more anonymous", then this is not the right approach.  here's why:
>
> as i have been told (and please correct me if i'm mistaken!), 
> basically, every OS-browser-proxy(-et.al.) combination is going to 
> leave behind a unique footprint that can be tracked by a skilled 
> adversary.  the more complicated you make your chain of proxies, the 
> more unique footprint it will leave.  in this respect it is best to 
> stick with a configuration more people use, hence anonymity.  good luck.
>
> on the other paw, if you are doing such a thing so you can research 
> these unique footprints and compile a database of sorts, please share 
> your results!  the more we know, the better each application can be 
> tuned so as to minimize and converge such unique footprints.

I don't know personally much people using linux and between the people i 
know i'm the skillest ... i'm too lazy for reading but i do it anyway 
offcourse and i think i can learn more asking experiences around that , 
usually , are not written anywhere . I have to admit i know linux my way 
which is not always the proper , people experience is important .
I like proxy servers and all their forms and i'm also curious on tools 
like sockat for example and i can read all manuals i want but only 
seeing someone using it i can learn the proper way to look at  ... it's 
just the way i am.
G!