Some legal trouble with TOR in France

Cat Okita cat at
Sun May 14 22:24:23 UTC 2006

On Mon, 15 May 2006, glymr wrote:
> just wanted to suggest that biometrics are not wise for encryption
> whatsoever. for one thing, they use a software mechanism to 'unlock'
> and this lock can be bypassed. voiceprint, retina/iris scan,
> fingerprints, dna, all of these things do not constitute a proper
> password or lock for any data, for one thing you can't change them,
> for a second thing, none of them generate a data stream which can be
> used as a passphrase, it all goes through an identification process
> and that only generates a yes/no answer. the usb key and the microwave
> are the best way to go. a smart card would probably be just as good,
> but not so cheap to implement.

... and biometrics also give new meaning to 'crippleware'.

"A cat spends her life conflicted between a deep, passionate and profound
desire for fish and an equally deep, passionate and profound desire to
avoid getting wet.  This is the defining metaphor of my life right now."

More information about the tor-talk mailing list