Fun NJ law proposed...

Void Beast daemonik.dragon at gmail.com
Wed Mar 8 23:13:24 UTC 2006


Ehehe... Look up phone phreaking...

Watson Ladd wrote:

>On 3/8/06, Matt Thorne <mlthorne at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>you forgot the blue one.
>>    
>>
>What blue box?
>  
>
>>On 3/6/06, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>We are safe: This law is unconstitutional, and we have the boxes:
>>>Soap
>>>Ballot
>>>Jury
>>>Ammo
>>>
>>>Use in that order to defend liberty.
>>>
>>>On 3/6/06, Josh <huber at paradoxical.net> wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2006/Bills/A1500/1327_I1.HTM
>>>>
>>>>In particular, this part is scary:
>>>>
>>>>"In addition, the bill makes any operator or Internet service
>>>> provider liable for compensatory and punitive damages as well as
>>>> costs of a law suit filed by a person damaged by the posting of
>>>> such messages if the operator or Internet service provider fails
>>>> to establish, maintain and enforce the policy required by section
>>>> 2 of the bill."
>>>>
>>>>Well, the rest of it's scary, too... ;-)
>>>>
>>>>Josh
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>--
>>>"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
>>>Temporary Safety deserve neither  Liberty nor Safety."
>>>-- Benjamin Franklin
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>--
>"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
>Temporary Safety deserve neither  Liberty nor Safety."
>-- Benjamin Franklin
>  
>



More information about the tor-talk mailing list