2600denver at gmail.com
Thu Jun 1 15:16:50 UTC 2006
Well, quite frankly you shouldn't. I would be just another opinion to
consider. In all honesty, if vidalia was a backdoor for the feds, I would
certainly be silenced or forced to say that it was clean. I'm doing it for
my own personal security, and you can do with my review what you want.
On 6/1/06, Anothony Georgeo <anogeorgeo at yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Ringo Kamens <2600denver at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have to say that the torcp doesn't seem at all
> > unstable in the windows xp home service pack one
> > world. Despite reassurances, I still have doubts
> > about the true intentions of vidalia...[snip]...I
> > will personally audit the source code for this to
> > satisfy my paranoia and I'll report back.
> > Ringo
> Did you not read Rogers's sentence?
> "The TorCP developers stopped working on it months ago
> and started Vidalia instead."
> I trust Vidalia mainly because I trust the Tor people
> (eg. Roger, Nick, et. alla.) and they included it in
> the bundle.
> BTW, (I'm not trying to be arugumentative) why should
> we trust you (and your review of the source) more than
> the authors of Vidalia and the recommendation of the
> Tor team?
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tor-talk