Hello directly from Jimbo at Wikipedia

Marc Abel m-abel at columbus.rr.com
Wed Sep 28 11:21:27 UTC 2005


New comment at end ....


On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 07:15, Jimmy Wales wrote:
> David Benfell wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:36:04 -0400, Jimmy Wales wrote:
> > 
> >>That seems to me to be no major problem.  A digitally signed token from
> >>Tor which says, in effect, "No guarantees, but this user is Alice has
> >>been around for a few months, and hasn't caused any trouble, so we
> >>figure they are more or less ok" would be fine.  And if that user causes
> >>us grief, then we just say "Sorry, Alice, even though Tor thinks you're
> >>ok, we're blocking you anyway."
> >>
> >>Or the signed token could say "Here's a random user, a new account, we
> >>don't know anything about him, his name is Bob" -- and we can choose to
> >>block it or accept it, based on empirical evidence.
> >>
> > 
> > And how is *this* anonymous?
> 
> Because they come to you anonymously.  You can't figure out who they
> really are in the real world.  All you know is that they are the same
> person as before.
> 
> --Jimbo

This has law enforcement implications; if you can prove that Alice took
the cookie from the cookie jar, perhaps using eyewitnesses, you can now
show that Alice did many other unreputable things.

Marc




More information about the tor-talk mailing list