Access for the uncomputed [signed]

[ADB [c]]

It could work. As you said, only for HTTP/FTP, and it's not inherently 
encrypted. Seems like it would be too easy for abuse by a less than 
ethical admin.
~Andrew

Joel Franusic wrote:

>I just ran across: CGIProxy
>(http://www.jmarshall.com/tools/cgiproxy/cgiproxy-beta.html)
>
>A Proxy over CGI of sorts, similar to CECID (?). This looks like a
>perfect front end for Tor.
>
>It supports SSL and it looks like it can be easily configured to use a
>proxy (Tor).
>
>Has anybody tried this out?
>
>--Joel
>
>On 6/22/05, Patrick Coleman <blinken at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Brilliant. I'll see if I cant get something going.
>>Thanks,
>>Patrick
>>
>>Roger Dingledine wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:45:17AM +0800, Patrick Coleman wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>shouldn't be too hard. I was actually considering interfacing it
>>>>        
>>>>
>>with a proper anonymizer at some
>>    
>>
>>>>point, like Tor, so I'd be happy to do that if thats what you want.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>That would be wonderful. We really do need something like this, that
>>>lets people point their browsers somewhere and be able to access .exit
>>>or .onion addresses.
>>>
>>>It should be even easier to find mirrors for you now too, because the
>>>mirrors don't need to be exiting the traffic themselves.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>--Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>On 23/06/05, Patrick Coleman <blinken at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>[I'll mail this to the list - I am subscribed, but at blinken at gmail.com]
>>>
>>>Hey,
>>>The client certainly hasn't had any work done on it for ages, so I was
>>>thinking of ditching that, certainly after I discovered tor. It was
>>>certainly a bit more complex than I bargained for :)
>>>
>>>With the script, it hasn't been developed in quite a while. I have
>>>been intending to do some work on it, though - I've got some working
>>>code that should fix a few problems, like SSL, forms and cookies.
>>>These fixes will also mean a rewrite of the HTTP fetching code, so
>>>working in HTTP proxying shouldn't be too hard. I was actually
>>>considering interfacing it with a proper anonymizer at some point,
>>>like Tor, so I'd be happy to do that if thats what you want.
>>>
>>>The script -shouldn't- be breaking stylesheets, so I'll have a look :)
>>>Thanks,
>>>Patrick
>>>+++
>>>Public Key ID 0x4A6880B2
>>>Key Fingerprint: 7867 E238 1608 1A20 89C4  BA6C 8FC3 C6EB 4A68 80B2
>>>http://warhn.org/pcoleman/pubkey.txt
>>>
>>>On 22/06/05, Roger Dingledine <arma at mit.edu> wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:26:33PM -0700, Joel Franusic wrote:
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Some quick searches on sf.net and freshmeat.net turn up:
>>>>>http://cecid.sourceforge.net/
>>>>>
>>>>>Links to servers running CECID:
>>>>>http://cecid.sourceforge.net/mirrors.php
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>Oh hey, and Patrick Coleman runs a Tor server too:
>>>>http://serifos.eecs.harvard.edu:8000/cgi-bin/desc.pl?q=hal
>>>>
>>>>Patrick, how is this going? It looks like Tor can replace the more
>>>>ambitious part of your project, but step one is still a hard task to
>>>>get right too. :)
>>>>
>>>>It looks like it's GPL, which is good. But it looks like it breaks
>>>>stylesheets of the pages it downloads (e.g. tor.eff.org), which is
>>>>bad. What about SSL to the proxy page? Does it have a back-end that can
>>>>http-proxy to privoxy, and/or socks4a-proxy to Tor?
>>>>
>>>>Is this still in development, or should I take the "Copyright 2003"
>>>>to be a bad sign? :)
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>--Roger
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Public Key ID 0x4A6880B2
>>>Key Fingerprint: 7867 E238 1608 1A20 89C4  BA6C 8FC3 C6EB 4A68 80B2
>>>http://warhn.org/pcoleman/pubkey.txt
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>--
>>Public Key ID 0x4A6880B2
>>Key Fingerprint: 7867 E238 1608 1A20 89C4  BA6C 8FC3 C6EB 4A68 80B2
>>http://warhn.org/pcoleman/pubkey.txt
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
<a href="http://www.sedo.com/search/details.php4?tracked=&partnerid=19673&language=us&domain=PHOENIXOFLIGHT.ORG">The domain Phoenixoflight.org is for sale!</a>




-- 

------------------------ [ SECURITY NOTICE ]
------------------------

To: or-talk at freehaven.net.

For your security, firefox-gen at walala.org

digitally signed this message on 19 October 2005 at 23:30:27 UTC.

Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify.

------------------- [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ]
-------------------

Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAjhvci10YWxrQGZyZWVoYXZlbi5uZXQAZmlyZWZveC1nZW5Ad2FsY
WxhLm9yZwBlbWFpbCBib2R5APEMAAB8AHwAAAABAAAAE9dWQ/EMAAD9AgACAAIAAgAgPn
D83eWmGCbOLDlwNW7+dbygr2FGLmvXHgPLFYnm4w8BAHOXCA/fwnUeLVCfzukYakxesIu
YN6YdwUxZqlEUlaavbnfimV9rCkTYxIf5eGd4r3gMI7hopTzBwGTajqUBk9mhlhjIU2ln
RW5k
--------------------- [ END DIGITAL SIGNATURE ]
---------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20051019/437bb740/attachment.htm>