Broadband Reports: Tor Network Bogged Down by P2P
jed c
n_o_t_here at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 18 07:04:15 UTC 2005
Guess I spoke to soon (without thinking).
--- Ben Wilhelm <zorba at pavlovian.net> wrote:
>
> So, um, how exactly do you track how much bandwidth
> each user is using
> on a network whose sole goal is anonymization?
I was thinking about something on the user side. I
don't know how many users would edit the source code
to get around something like this.
>
> And then let's associate that information with a
> server that's supposed
> to have an admin email contact available.
I understand that tor is about privacy and anonimity.
>
> -Ben
>
> jed c wrote:
> > The solution seems simple to me. Anyone using huge
> > amounts of bandwidth should be required to run a
> tor
> > router.
> >
> >
> >>Chris Palmer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>----- Forwarded message from John Gilmore
> >
> > <gnu at toad.com> -----
> >
> >>>From: John Gilmore <gnu at toad.com>
> >>>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:40:18 -0700
> >>>Subject: [E-IP] Broadband Reports: Tor Network
> >
> > Bogged Down by P2P
> >
> >>>http://www.broadbandreports.com/shownews/68438
> >>>
> >>>Some time ago our security regulars broke down
> the
> >
> > logistics behind
> >
> >>>Tor, an anonymity tool from the Electronic
> Frontier
> >
> > Foundation. It was
> >
> >>>designed for whistle-blowers, political
> dissidents,
> >
> > researchers, and
> >
> >>>others concerned about exchanging information
> >
> > without authoritarian
> >
> >>>backlash. Sadly network performance is being
> >
> > jeopardized by
> >
> >>>file-traders looking to evade the RIAA.
> >>>
> >>>File traders have been reconfiguring their Bit
> >
> > Torrent clients to take
> >
> >>>advantage of the network. Unfortunately the Tor
> >
> > network wasn't
> >
> >>>designed with high volume porn transfer in mind,
> so
> >
> > the activity is
> >
> >>>slowing it down to a crawl. The likely result
> will
> >
> > be the EFF running
> >
> >>>against the grain of their mandate, and
> restricting
> >
> > network use.
> >
> >>>...
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>----- End forwarded message -----
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Bah, I see no problem with using it to evade the
> >
> > RIAA. sure, it sucks
> >
> >>for us Tor people who use it for what is was
> >
> > intended for. It just
> >
> >>means we need more nodes, and we need to grow more
> >
> > to support this
> >
> >>demand. I'm all for giving the finger to "the
> man."
> >>
> >>It's time for Tor to expand, not regulate. And if
> >
> > expansions isn't
> >
> >>possible, just let it suck! I can't imagine many
> >
> > fileshare people will
> >
> >>cleave unto dial-up speeds with their broadband...
>
> >
> > Once they learn that
> >
> >>it sucks to use Tor, they'll stop. We need
> >
> > knee-jerk decisions in this
> >
> >>project like we need knee-jerk political
> actions...
> >>
> >>But, that's just my $0.02
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home
> page!
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list