Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2
Eugen Leitl
eugen at leitl.org
Tue Oct 11 14:34:22 UTC 2005
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:27:18AM -0500, Arrakistor wrote:
> I wonder if there is a more agressive way to knock out p2p traffic
> without much overhead. Such as if kazaa or azureus signed their
> packets.
FWIW, I noticed a sudden dropoff in traffic since adopting
the new default policy.
I've also been served with an abuse complaint by Business
Software Alliance which went on
Date Found: 10 Oct 2005 09:24:18 EDT (GMT -0400)
Network: BTPeers
IP Address: 213.239.210.243
IP Port: 6881
Protocol: BitTorrent
UserName:
Content being offered:
----------------------------------------------
Filename: [isoHunt] Photoshop CS2 v9[1][1].0 + working
KeyGen.torrent|Photoshop CS2|Adobe(R)
Photoshop(R) CS2Adobe Photoshop CS2.msi
Filesize: 4,972k
and 6881 should have been blocked by my old ExitPolicy.
Check yours, maybe it's not doing what it should be doing.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20051011/93208b02/attachment.pgp>
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list