Tor network speed
Matej Kovacic
matej.kovacic at owca.info
Thu Dec 30 11:10:04 UTC 2004
Hi,
> Is this 'normal'? Is this the pay-off for privacy? It almost seems
> like too much to pay for the benefit, unless using AIM clients where
> speed isn't necessarily needed!
I tested Tor on Windows and it looks OK, but... it would be great if Tor
won't be in DOS window, but in a system tray and run as a process.
And also.. what if Tor will be combined with firewall. For me, one of
the best firewalls on Windows is Personal Tiny Firewall (I am using very
old free version).
PTF computes fingerprint for each application which uses internet
connection. For instance: if you have Mozilla, PTF checks whether
fingerprint (MD5 checksum) of firefox.exe is as it should be. If it is
not (someone replaced "trusted" exe with trojan or if Firefox has been
upgraded), user is prompted about that.
Now... what if Tor will have similar functionality, but user will be
able to decide for every application if it uses Tor connection or not.
So.. your BitTorrent client will not use it, AIM will use it, etc. Not
just on / off, but selectively on/off for each application (and when
there will be new application, Tor will ask you what to do).
I do not support piracy, because piracy is also bad for open source and
free software. But MPAA and RIAA actions could be used for increasing
awareness of software like Tor.
Look at the moment to P2P software. You can use it for download, but you
also have to upload something (you can disable this, but default setting
is like that). It is inconvenient to just download and nothing upload
(for example BitTorrent: when you finish, almost in a second someone
starts downloading from you). If P2P clients will be designed only for
downloading, they won't be successible. So this philosophy that if you
want to download, you must also upload sometnihg, forced people to act
"sympathetically" and not just egoistically.
This philosophy could be used also here. If you want to protect your
privacy, let's protect privacy of others too. And this philosophy could
be promoted as a response to antipiracy and especially censorship
actions. If every P2P "leecher" will install Tor server, internet
surveillance won't be possible on a great scale anymore.
And as seen in a KaZaA example, people are willing to install even
spyware to get the benefits of P2P.
bye, Matej
--
http://matej.owca.info/
Mi ne morete poslati odgovora na e-mail?
Problems replying to this e-mail?
--> http://matej.owca.info/email.html
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list