[tor-scaling] Summary of 5/31 meeting; next steps

[teor]

> On 9 Jun 2019, at 04:53, Rob Jansen <rob.g.jansen at nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
> 
>> On Jun 7, 2019, at 8:39 AM, David Goulet <dgoulet at torproject.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On 04 Jun (19:12:57), Rob Jansen wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 4, 2019, at 7:38 AM, David Goulet <dgoulet at torproject.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I've attached the latest list of versions we have in the network, you'll
>>>> see what I meant by quite spread out.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for this, David!
>>> 
>>> If it is easy enough, it would be helpful to also list some notion of the
>>> selection probability associated with each version in addition to the raw
>>> number of relays. This could be as simple as the normalized consensus weight
>>> for each Tor version. That will give us a better sense of the fraction of
>>> Tor traffic running over each version.
>> 
>> Yes easy, thanks to the wonderness of Stem! :)
>> 
>> I've attached the file with the data from the latest consensus.
>> 
>> No easy way to print that in a useful format but I made it to be all aligned
>> so you can at least do some sort magic on the columns :).
> 
> 
> Thanks David! For each Tor version number, you could list the total weight for that version (currently shown in your rightmost column) divided by the sum of all weights across all versions. That will yield a fraction of the weight that corresponds to each version (which you could convert into a percentage), which I think it easier to interpret that the raw weight totals.

Grouping by major and minor version would also be helpful.

For example:
0.2.9 total 1%
0.2.9.14     0.5%
0.2.9.15     0.5%

T