[tor-relays] Responding to Tor censorship in Russia

[lists at for-privacy.net]

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 3:11:25 PM CET John Ricketts wrote:
> That's what I was thinking...  I run 100 exit nodes.  I'd like to get more
> opinions.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tor-relays <tor-relays-bounces at lists.torproject.org> On Behalf Of
> Felix Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 8:04 AM
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Responding to Tor censorship in Russia
> 
> 
> > Since all of my exit nodes are within the same /16 - would I have to
> > run bridges on newly acquired IPv4 space?--
> 
> A bridge has no `family´. An entity running bridge and exit generates an
Unfortunately this is a bad design flaw. :-(

> end-to-end situation and might not be what we want.
An entity that wants to exploit the end-to-end situation just does it under  
fake names. Well-known and proven operators cannot help the Tor project.
We actually want to do the same thing as John. Known exit operators who want 
to set up several 100 bridges.


-- 
╰_╯ Ciao Marco!

Debian GNU/Linux

It's free software and it gives you freedom!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20211209/b8e144e5/attachment.sig>