[tor-relays] Dirport9030

[Nuno Rego]

OK thank you. I'm going to do some tests and see the results. 

Cumprimentos;
Nuno

-- 
Securely sent with Tutanota. Get your own encrypted, ad-free mailbox: 
https://tutanota.com



Mar 23, 2020, 07:47 by arma at torproject.org:

> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:16:27PM +0100, Nuno Rego wrote:
>
>> As I said, I'm still learning. I have a server at Hetzner with a monthly limit of 20TB, and I am trying to adjust the speed so that it does not exceed 20TB at the end of the month. The problem is that whenever I place the BandwidthRate and BandwidthBurst above 10MB I lose the Guard, HSdir and V2Dir flags. On the page https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/TugaOnion I see that DirPort is 0 instead of 9030. I have the BandwidthRate and BandwidthBurst at 9MB and everything is fine, but I will reach the end of the month and I only spent about 10TB.
>>
>
> Check your logs. They likely say something like
>
> "Not advertising DirPort (Reason: AccountingMax enabled)"
>
> So your relay is indeed opening the DirPort, but it is opting to leave it
> out of the descriptor that it publishes (i.e. not mention it to anybody),
> in order to save its limited bandwidth for more important traffic.
>
> You can read more about the design here:
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/src/feature/relay/router.c?h=tor-0.4.2.7#n1199
>
> Your options include:
>
> (A) Leave your BandwidthRate at 9MBytes, but crank up your BandwidthBurst
> super high so the rate limiting rarely actually kicks in. In theory the
> bandwidth authority measurers should decide that you're really quite
> fast compared to the other relays that claim 9MBytes/s, and assign you
> more traffic. (I say 'in theory' because the bwauths are a source of
> much randomness and chaos these days, so it is easy to describe what we
> hope they will do, but harder to predict what they will actually do. :)
>
> (B) Turn both your BandwidthRate and BandwidthBurst way up, so that you
> use a lot of traffic even only in the 'middle hop' spot. It's hard to
> say how this one will work out in practice, but in theory (there's that
> phrase again) the bwauths should recognize that you can handle a lot of
> load as a middle hop, and direct more traffic to you there.
>
> (C) Sit back, relax, and be pleased that you're offering 10TBytes/mo
> to the network.
>
> All of these are valid directions to go in, I would say.
>
> Thanks!
> --Roger
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20200323/0b761fd7/attachment.html>