[tor-relays] >23% Tor exit relay capacity found to be malicious - call for support for proposal to limit large scale attacks

[nusenu]

Charly Ghislain:
> I have nothing against this proposal although im not sure it would be that
> much efficient.
> Especially, how does it make relay operations 'less sustainable' or 'more
> risky'?

I assume you mean "make _malicious_ relay operations 'less sustainable' ..".

It would be less sustainable because they would have to run relays for longer before they can
start exploiting tor users.
And "more risky" because physical letter delivery requires them to pay someone and 
hiding money trails is usually harder than hiding the origin of someone creating a random email address.


-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20200706/bf845eaf/attachment-0001.sig>