[tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth
mwestfall at ecansol.com
Mon Dec 16 18:45:27 UTC 2019
Consensus weight is no lo ger based on advertised bandwidth to prevent abuse.
It is based on measured and observed actual throughput.
President & CIO
ECAN Solutions, Inc.
On December 16, 2019 1:30:48 PM EST, Neel Chauhan <neel at neelc.org> wrote:
>After having my Primcast.com dedicated server suspended, I signed up
>a dedicated server from Psychz Networks in their Dallas location to run
>a FreeBSD-powered Tor exit relay.
>While Psychz is a bit more expensive than Primcast/ServerRoom (and that
>is with an special offer), I get a slightly faster server and far
>One problem is that the consensus weight value is rather low in
>proportion to the advertised bandwidth value, when they should be
>In fact, my server's CPU usage never goes beyond 1%.
>Is this normal now that sbws is being deployed? Or is it bad peering on
>tor-relays mailing list
>tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tor-relays