[tor-relays] Exit friendly ISPs

[grarpamp]

On 9/17/18, niftybunny <abuse at to-surf-and-protect.net> wrote:
> [cost, cost, cost]

>> freedom is a profitable business model.

We charge double and up rates to ignore and manage everything,
short of legal process served, with you on point in role until you're not.
Exits, torrents, gaming, IRC, shells, free speech, social nets,
researchers, political sites, any legal business... all fine... bring it.
Who's in?


>>> reputation costs
>>
>> So these ISPs get a bad reputation mark on the list of
>> bad isp's, on forums, on lists, etc.
>
> No, they don’t. We (the Tor people) are a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction
> of a tiny fraction. Nobody really cares about us.

Opinion: RIMU hosting sucks.
Why: Because they refuse to host legal exits,
 or state / negotiate any upstream terms regarding them.
Changepoint: When they do either or both of those.

There, that should search rank before long.

> They have 1 Million websites hosted, who cares
> about 2-3 people complaining they do not host Tor exists?

If that was an ISP's ratio they'd have much bigger things to
deal with, and efficiences in dealing with them, than to
care about banning a handful of exit customers.

Absent prohibition in law or upstream contract, most
ISP's banning such things simply haven't done much
to develop and...

>> Explore the possible.