[tor-relays] Greypony / Conrad Rockenhaus offline?

Matt Traudt pastly at torproject.org
Thu Oct 4 22:24:01 UTC 2018


On October 4, 2018 4:54:54 PM EDT, Nathaniel Suchy <me at lunorian.is> wrote:
>We wouldn’t have to make these threads if community members like Isaac
>didn’t make threads about a lack of response from one team member.
>
>We could:
>A) Inform everyone
>B) Inform a few customers and hope we don’t miss any
>C) Ignore the problem and have more negative  threads created about us.
>
>Whatever we do it turns out negative for someone.
>
>Cordially,
>Nathaniel Suchy
>
>On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:50 PM s7r <s7r at sky-ip.org> wrote:
>
>> George wrote:
>> > Roman Mamedov:
>> >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 03:52:24 +0200
>> >> niftybunny <abuse at to-surf-and-protect.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A Tor friendly ISP is gone has nothing to do with a Tor relay
>mailing
>> list?
>> >>
>> >> Yes I would say so. Mentioning a few Tor nodes going offline is
>one
>> thing, but
>> >> by now half of this list is covered in total b/s drivel such as
>> >
>> > Agree strongly.
>> >
>>
>> +1
>> First of all, we are not talking about an ISP in the real sense of
>the
>> word. Is is OVH who is the ISP. This is a re-seller of an ISP, but
>this
>> is not the point.
>>
>> The point is, with all due respect, this really has to stop. it has
>been
>> so much noise about this, more than any CVE vulnerability we had.
>This
>> is not what this mailing list is meant for. This is not Conrad
>> Rockenhaus blog or support forums. If so much people on this list are
>> interested in this topic these people should setup their own
>community,
>> own mail list and own blogs / forums where they can talk about
>Greypony
>> until the Earth as a planet becomes square. But it is off topic here.
>> This statement could have been sent directly to their customers, not
>to
>> everyone on the list.
>>
>> Would you like me to start sending every day emails about how I
>bought a
>> provider independent prefix and contracted 2 upstream providers with
>BGP
>> sessions and 4gbps bwidth? I done this to avoid being thrown over and
>> over by hosters as I changed more than 5 in the last 2 years. I
>didn't
>> notify anyone about it as I don't think anyone should care.
>>
>> For example the BGP session with my backup provider failed today for
>45
>> minutes. Would you like to hear about it? I sent them an email. They
>> fixed it. Hmmm.
>>
>> On the other side of things, I am really sorry about the health
>> incident, which is of course sad, and I wish Conrad a fast recovery
>and
>> best wishes for his health and his family.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>

Please go start your own mailing list for support/updates/etc.

Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20181004/2db77797/attachment.html>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list