[tor-relays] TorExitGuidelines

[nusenu]

Moritz Bartl:
> On 03.03.2018 07:11, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> Apparently the link from my blog post, to
>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines
>> no longer has any mention pro or con disk encryption. I wonder if that
>> was intentionally removed by the torservers.net folks (maybe they have
>> even changed their mind on the advice?), or if it just fell out because
>> it's a wiki.
> 
> I added the recommendation for "no disk encryption" back then, and it
> wasn't me who removed it.

This was my mistake in an edit on 2018-01-12 [1], I fixed/restored it now [2].

Is the information about "contact us at support at torservers.net" and the XMPP chat still valid?



> My own opinion has changed slightly: My general advice would still be to
> not do disk encryption, to reduce the amount of hassle and allow easier
> 'audits'. For additional protection, you better move the relay keys to a
> RAM disk.

Also consider OfflineMasterKeys.



[1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines?action=diff&version=40&old_version=39
[2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines?sfp_email=&sfph_mail=&action=diff&version=44&old_version=40&sfp_email=&sfph_mail=
-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
twitter: @nusenu_

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20180310/7637664f/attachment.sig>