[tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 80, Issue 26

[King Queen]

See https://www.kimsufi.com/en/termsofservice/ "Special conditions for
Kimsufi Servers"

"7.4 For security reasons, OVH reserves the right to proceed with the
immediate suspension without notice, of any server on which there is a
public service Proxy, IRC, VPN or TOR which is available free of
charge or for a fee, and for which OVH has knowledge of its fraudulent
or illegal misuse."

Long experience is that the second they get any form of abuse
complaint they just terminate the server.

D

Wednesday, September 20, 2017, 12:06:18 AM, you wrote:

> I should think they’d be fine, considering they “allow" scanning on their servers.
> If they were VPSs on the OVH range they’d care, but for a dedi as
> long as they’re not DoSing or getting insane amounts of abuse reports you’ll be fine.
> If you look at the ASN on atlas there are a few long-living Tor
> exit nodes running on Kimsufi/SoYouStart/OVH
>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 4:58 PM, King Queen <kingqueenits at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> For an exit node?! They will most definitely not be fine; they don't
>> allow them and they don't like any admin hassle at all as a result of
>> their ultra-cheap kimsufi dedis. The first whiff of an abuse complaint
>> and they'll nuke the server and probably the account.
>> 
>> Monday, September 18, 2017, 10:06:24 PM, you wrote:
>> 
>>> Tried Kimsufi? I believe that’ll be fine.
>> 
>>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:27 PM, flipchan <flipchan at riseup.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> https://okservers.net/ doesn't provide vps :/ something like a good
>>> ISP that tolerate exit nodes would be good like something in holland maybe?
>> 
>> 
>>> On September 18, 2017 1:50:45 AM GMT+02:00,
>>> tor-relays-request at lists.torproject.org wrote:
>>> Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
>>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> 
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> tor-relays-request at lists.torproject.org
>> 
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> tor-relays-owner at lists.torproject.org
>> 
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."
>> 
>> 
>>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>> 1. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (King Queen)
>>> 2. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (Alec Larsen)
>>> 3. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (nusenu)
>>> 4. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (nusenu)
>>> 5. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (George)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:59:12 +0100
>>> From: King Queen <kingqueenits at gmail.com>
>>> To: armenian_priest <tor-relays at lists.torproject.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tolerant hosting for exit node.
>>> Message-ID: <1674967117.20170917195912 at gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> 
>>> https://box.cock.li FTW
>> 
>>> yeah it's servers with cocks, but it is in Romania / IP location the
>>> Seychelles, and I have had no issues with my exit node on them.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Sunday, September 17, 2017, 11:32:33 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Hello list,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> I was hoping to get a good suggestion from here for a hosting provider
>>> that is tolerant with Tor exit nodes.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> I went through the mailing list archive a few months back and there 
>>> weren't any good suggestions on hosting providers.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Also, I checked the 'GoodBadISPs' page in the Tor wiki but it is pretty
>>> outdated and I already got burned with one provider from there: ITLDC,
>>> it was added on 2016-04-23 but they bluntly stated that they DO NOT 
>>> tolerate exit nodes after 2 abuse complaints, my exit node was running
>>> for 1 month there.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> One of the abuses was handled but with the second one they basically 
>>> wanted me to block HTTP/S traffic on the VPS.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> I am not sure who edits and keeps track of the mentioned page but it 
>>> would be a good idea to remove the mentioned provider from there so 
>>> other people wont waste their money.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Hope to get some recommendations since I want to support the network 
>>> with an exit node.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Thanks in advance!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> With regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> jack
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Take Care Sincerely flipchan layerprox
>>> dev_______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best regards,
>> King                            mailto:kingqueenits at gmail.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays



-- 
Best regards,
 King                            mailto:kingqueenits at gmail.com