[tor-relays] Kitten1 and kitten2 compromised (guard/hs/fallback directory)

[Chris Kerr]

On Saturday, 20 May 2017 17:31:25 CEST Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, aeris <aeris+tor at imirhil.fr> wrote:
> >> Could you please share some more information about the incident?
> > 
> > From what I know and what I can speak about :
> > 
> > A big and sensible French company was infected with Wannacry this 12/05.
> 
> Sounds like you meant to write either "sensitive" or "insensible".
> Sensible is not the word I would use to describe this company! :)

Yes, 'sensible', like 'actually' and 'eventually', is a "false friend" whose 
meaning in English is different from that in just about every other European 
language (but the other languages are consistent with each other e.g. 
'sensible' in French and 'sensibel' in German have the same meaning), which 
sometimes leads to confusion. Even more confusingly, 'insensible' is not the 
opposite of 'sensible' but rather means either 'imperceptible' or 
'unconscious'.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170520/0b57a6de/attachment.sig>