[tor-relays] Consensus Weight calculation

teor teor2345 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 29 07:19:22 UTC 2017


> On 29 Jun 2017, at 16:03, Vort <vvort at yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
> In order to estimate the effect of relays unstuck
>  measures, I have made some graphs.
> 
> The first graph shows how many relays in the network have
>  weight < 20 (in percents, relative to total measured, valid and running count):
> 
> https://s8.hostingkartinok.com/uploads/images/2017/06/e905280414853a800031e7ffbeba02c0.png
> 
> And I see some drop at June, 15: from ~7.4% to ~6.6%.
> This corresponds to increase of my relay weight: from ~10 to ~20.
> Looks like this is the effect of increasing the minimum test file size.

No, we have not changed the minimum test file size yet.
This is probably just random measurement variation.

The only thing we have started testing over the last few days is:
> * making an automatic process to un-stick stuck relays

We tried to unstick some of the lowest bandwidth relays (below 1000),
and our initial results are:
* most (15) of relays we tried are actually very slow, or down,
* some (3) relays that we tried went down before we could see if we had
  changed anything,
* 1 relay that we tried increased its bandwidth 10x, but we don't
  know if it was because of us, or something else.

We are trying on a larger set now. If we get better results, maybe we
will make it automatic. But these results indicate that most relays
that are measured slow are actually slow for tor clients.
(Which is what matters.)

T
--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170629/8057125b/attachment.sig>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list