[tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

[niftybunny]

BGP should choose another path? BGP Routing is highly “political” but IPs just black holed is really really bad …
If this is true: WTF?!

niftybunny
abuse at to-surf-and-protect.net



> On 24 Jan 2017, at 05:24, teor <teor2345 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 24 Jan 2017, at 15:18, niftybunny <abuse at to-surf-and-protect.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Could I get an ELI5 for this please?
> 
> If you want an ELI5, explain your request like I'm five years old.
> 
>>> On 24 Jan 2017, at 04:40, John Ricketts <john at quintex.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It is entirely possible this is a result of the HE vs Cogent feud, big break in the IPv6 routing tables as a cogent is refusing to peer with HE.  Not sure where they are in that negotiation…
> 
> When two big internet companies don't agree on who pays when they swap
> packets, they punish their users by refusing to swap packets with each
> other.
> 
> T
> 
> --
> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
> 
> teor2345 at gmail dot com
> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170124/bd3e8043/attachment.html>