[tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 73, Issue 29

contact at charlieluna.com contact at charlieluna.com
Mon Feb 20 17:22:56 UTC 2017 

On 2017-02-20 04:00, tor-relays-request at lists.torproject.org wrote:
> Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
> 	tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	tor-relays-request at lists.torproject.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	tor-relays-owner at lists.torproject.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. large server farms (contact at charlieluna.com)
>    2. Re: large server farms (teor)
>    3. Re: large server farms (Duncan)
>    4. Re: large server farms (I)
>    5. Re: large server farms (niftybunny)
>    6. Re: large server farms (anondroid)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:44:25 -0800
> From: contact at charlieluna.com
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: [tor-relays] large server farms
> Message-ID: <457551c757ee4a355917f577d2f9a7ba at charlieluna.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor
> services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from 
> the
> server facility to each subscriber. The power requirements could be
> handled by solar and wind systems and any water needs can be created by
> means of water collection systems and solar heat collectors for hot
> water. I think it's totally feasible. What do you guys think?
> 
> Also, I'm very hardcore about taking back the internet for the people.
> No more of this for-profit stuff where we get throttled and our freedom
> of speech is abridged. Internet for the people is a means of freedom of
> speech. Let's take it back.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:47:46 +1100
> From: teor <teor2345 at gmail.com>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
> Message-ID: <E696CA8C-A1A6-4D14-8B3C-E901C81E7D55 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> 
>> On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:44, contact at charlieluna.com wrote:
>> 
>> I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor 
>> services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from 
>> the server facility to each subscriber
> 
> Tor is a decentralised network, that's designed to be secure even if
> users aren't directly connected to their network entry points.
> 
> Can you tell us what you're trying to achieve for users by centralising
> Tor services like this?
> 
> (And what services you intend to provide?)
> 
> T
> 
> --
> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
> 
> teor2345 at gmail dot com
> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 801 bytes
> Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
> URL:
> <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170220/a3cbec03/attachment-0001.sig>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 01:41:47 +0000
> From: Duncan <dguthrie at posteo.net>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
> Message-ID: <e6b68354-6c4d-94ed-1eab-5c60a8c9ecca at posteo.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Hi
> 
> This seems like it would centralize some of the network. There are
> already concerns about regular data-centers being able to access Tor
> relays - someone malicious (yourself, someone compelling you, another
> party etc) could then have access to lots of Tor relays at once, for
> good or ill.
> 
> Have you considered these issues at all?
> 
> D
> 
> On 20/02/17 00:44, contact at charlieluna.com wrote:
>> I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor
>> services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from
>> the server facility to each subscriber. The power requirements could
>> be handled by solar and wind systems and any water needs can be
>> created by means of water collection systems and solar heat collectors
>> for hot water. I think it's totally feasible. What do you guys think?
>> 
>> Also, I'm very hardcore about taking back the internet for the people.
>> No more of this for-profit stuff where we get throttled and our
>> freedom of speech is abridged. Internet for the people is a means of
>> freedom of speech. Let's take it back.
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:31:41 -0800
> From: I <beatthebastards at inbox.com>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
> Message-ID: <8F58CC00C4E.000004E8beatthebastards at inbox.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Hot water?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:36:37 +0100
> From: niftybunny <abuse at to-surf-and-protect.net>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
> Message-ID:
> 	<76C7DBC4-5884-4946-A4B7-35E800A7A128 at to-surf-and-protect.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Personal hygiene is very important, Pig-Pen.
> 
> 
> niftybunny
> abuse at to-surf-and-protect.net
> 
> 
>> On 20 Feb 2017, at 03:31, I <beatthebastards at inbox.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hot water?
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170220/bebddc38/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:34:35 -0500
> From: anondroid <tor at anondroid.com>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
> Message-ID:
> 	<B52sc6WG_bzt4KVfKGLfClm4alHdpOg_Kc-d7kVF3sGkqhmVFmBXHRTjIuucVzocjhstUnaDdwCyeZFQUev5cugaQCzVtrjfZKrGTOs33Uw=@anondroid.com>
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
>> how to get the coaxial cable ran from the server facility to each 
>> subscriber
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Wut?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20170220/e8929535/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of tor-relays Digest, Vol 73, Issue 29
> ******************************************

ok. sorry. bad idea. i just thought maybe this would help with our 
individual bandwidths being used by the tor service since each 
individual can run a relay or bridge. i just thought it'd help with 
that. so scrap my idea.

More information about the tor-relays mailing list