[tor-relays] Tor abuse complaints (per MBit/s)

Moritz Bartl moritz at torservers.net
Thu Sep 29 20:32:33 UTC 2016


On 09/29/2016 04:29 PM, Cristian Consonni wrote:
> You are correct in a sense. On the another hand in academia until a
> work is published in a peer-reviewed conference or journal it does not
> really count (you make like this or not, but this is another issue)
> and/or it would be evident that it is a work in progress.
> 
> Moritz mentioned a possible problem with the press misinterpreting the
> results of this report: I would expect that a _bona fide_ journalist
> that is able to find such a report on the website of a research would
> also know that these are preliminary results. I would also expect such
> a journalist to reach out to the authors for comments. If not, let's
> say that against ignorance or malice you can not do much (even with a
> completed work) and I would not blame the authors for the deficiencies
> of others.
> 
> That said, I do not see any other way to make this work reachable so
> that the authors can talk about their  preliminary results with as
> many people as possible - and the "tor community" at large. The
> alternative would be to select a closed group of people with whom to
> share the report.
> 
> Being a fan of "release early, release often" I prefer the current alternative.

Totally agreed. Just for the record, Sadia reached out to me to ask
before she posted here what they have so far.

-- 
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/


More information about the tor-relays mailing list