[tor-relays] relay lost most of its consensus weight

teor teor2345 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 00:10:33 UTC 2016


> On 13 Sep 2016, at 23:30, jensm1 <jensm1 at bbjh.de> wrote:
> 
> I last restarted the relay five days ago (update to 0.2.8.7). Can a restart really cause the consensus weight to drop several days later? If it drops within a few hours, I'd get that, but what would delay that response that much?
> (Not complaining, just genuinely curious.)

I'm really not sure - any flag changes should have an impact within an hour.
Several days later is more likely to be bandwidth authority measurement - is your relay up and capable of transmitting as much traffic as it was before it was restarted?
Are its ports open to all other relays?
Can it open connections to other relays, regardless of their ports?
Did you make any other config changes at the same time?

Tim

> 
> Am 13.09.2016 um 10:37 schrieb teor:
>>> On 13 Sep 2016, at 18:05, jensm1 <jensm1 at bbjh.de>
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I just realised that my relay 'itwasntme' lost most of its consensus
>>> weight yesterday morning. The relay is only three weeks old, but it was
>>> finally picking up some traffic, which now is gone again.
>>> What could be the cause for this? Is there a problem with my relay or
>>> configuration?
>>> 
>> It looks like you just recently gained some consensus weight, then temporarily lost it after you restarted your relay.
>> We're working on improving the stability algorithm so these temporary downtimes don't affect relays as much.
>> But in any case, wait a week or two, and it will be back.
>> (If not, please let us know.)
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>>> Thanks for your help!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/F46C312E279185364F46EA06C58F7925280911E2
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> 
>>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>> 
>> teor2345 at gmail dot com
>> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
>> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
>> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> 
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
> www.avast.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org






-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160914/3727187a/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list