[tor-relays] #torstrike

Kenneth Freeman kencf0618 at riseup.net
Thu Sep 1 22:24:35 UTC 2016



On 09/01/2016 01:47 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On 8/31/16, Kenneth Freeman <kencf0618 at riseup.net> wrote:

>> To me it seems to be a bit late in the day for a Cambrian
>> Explosion -let a thousand anonymity networks bloom and see where it gets
>> you.
> 
> I wouldn't say that. So long as any particular network is
> incapable or insufficient at resisting certain adversaries...
> or any of its models on the people or other sides of things
> are non ideal, or it just doesn't do what its users need it to
> do, there's in fact every expectation that other networks
> should and will bloom up. 1000? No of course not. Yet a
> handful of similar nets based on some feature chart... sure.

I was riffing a bit on Mao's infamous Hundred Flowers Campaign. "The
policy of letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of
thought contend is designed to promote the flourishing of the arts and
the progress of science." Depends on your threat model, I suppose.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xDD79757F.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3129 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160901/ad7c9d59/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160901/ad7c9d59/attachment.sig>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list