[tor-relays] You dont love me anymore :(

[David Goulet]

On 18 Oct (20:11:45), Markus Koch wrote:
>  20:08:18 [WARN] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from
> server '86.59.21.38:80' while fetching
> "/tor/keys/fp-sk/14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A-
>    8DF2E8B4-692049A2E7868BE9933107A39B1CE0C7CBF1BF65".
>  20:06:18 [WARN] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from
> server '194.109.206.212:80' while fetching
> "/tor/keys/fp-sk/14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401-
>    C02A8DF2E8B4-692049A2E7868BE9933107A39B1CE0C7CBF1BF65".
>  20:05:18 [WARN] http status 400 ("Authdir is rejecting routers in
> this range.") response from dirserver '171.25.193.9:443'. Please
> correct.
>  20:05:18 [WARN] http status 400 ("Authdir is rejecting routers in
> this range.") response from dirserver '154.35.175.225:80'. Please
> correct.
>  20:05:18 [WARN] http status 400 ("Authdir is rejecting routers in
> this range.") response from dirserver '131.188.40.189:80'. Please
> correct.
>  20:05:18 [WARN] http status 400 ("Authdir is rejecting routers in
> this range.") response from dirserver '86.59.21.38:80'. Please
> correct.
> 
> This is my niftypika server. This is animal abuse! Seriously, WTF is
> going wrong?

Hi!

It turns out that our last change to the dirauth configuration to reject newly
discovered malicious relays had the _wrong_ IPs for the relay fingerprints...
and you relay IP was a victim of this :S ...

My apologize! I'm currently working on fixing this, you should be back in the
consensus once authorities update from the mistake.

Again, sorry!
David

> 
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 585 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20161018/427cd13e/attachment.sig>