[tor-relays] Drop in consensus weight

r1610091651 r1610091651 at telenet.be
Tue Nov 8 16:37:29 UTC 2016


Thanks for the link to consensus-health, based data available:

05/11 17:00
longclaw=4540
gabelmoo=4170
moria1=4410
faravahar=2520
=> cons: 4170

05/11 18:00
longclaw=4550
gabelmoo=*2170*
moria1=4410
faravahar=2520
=> cons: *2520*

So that explains the drop.

Seb

On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 at 13:40 teor <teor2345 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On 8 Nov. 2016, at 23:32, r1610091651 <r1610091651 at telenet.be> wrote:
> >
> > The previous drops, i know why they happened (related to server
> unavailability) so I know the cause. For 5th however I have no clue.
>
> As far as I can tell, the relay is accurately measured.
>
> Sometimes, this means that you get a lower measurement than you might have
> had before.
>
> Accurate bandwidth measurements are a good thing for tor users, even if the
> changes in the measurement are sometimes (temporarily) disappointing to
> relay
> operators.
>
> If you want to improve the measurements, try adding more bandwidth.
> For your relay, this means increasing BandwidthRate and BandwidthBurst.
>
> T
>
> --
> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>
> teor2345 at gmail dot com
> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20161108/64f40cdc/attachment.html>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list