[tor-relays] The Tor's non-discretionary model - Milica D. Djekic
Milica Đekić
milicadjekic82 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 14:56:51 UTC 2016
Would Tor use a non-discretionary model of data transfer between the relays
that would be a part of non-centralized network? Is there any real
encryption in sense of information flow or only a conversion from discrete
to non-discrete signal? Which circuitry algorithm would get used for so?
Sorry, for asking all of these - I am just reading the history of
anonymity. Thank you so much!
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <tor-relays-request at lists.torproject.org>
wrote:
> Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> tor-relays-request at lists.torproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> tor-relays-owner at lists.torproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It]
> (Roger Dingledine)
> 2. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It]
> (Greg Moss)
> 3. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It]
> (JovianMallard)
> 4. Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It
> (Peter Palfrader)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:21:38 -0400
> From: Roger Dingledine <arma at mit.edu>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never
> Initiated It]
> Message-ID: <20160531232138.GB55745 at moria.seul.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:05:23PM -0400, Percy Blakeney wrote:
> > In addition I DO NOT have the full Xfinity package.
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm going to put an end to this thread now. Please be aware that 1700+
> people are on the tor-relays list, so we really need to keep things
> concise and on-topic.
>
> Thanks!
> --Roger
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:25:32 -0700
> From: Greg Moss <gmoss82 at gmail.com>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never
> Initiated It]
> Message-ID:
> <CALA4K1TTE11B21p7Vb3+K=GBiomzJT5o_kk=
> EwUOn0Mbwo_v9A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thanks Mr dingledine- was a good laugh but enough is enough
> On May 31, 2016 4:21 PM, "Roger Dingledine" <arma at mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:05:23PM -0400, Percy Blakeney wrote:
> > In addition I DO NOT have the full Xfinity package.
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm going to put an end to this thread now. Please be aware that 1700+
> people are on the tor-relays list, so we really need to keep things
> concise and on-topic.
>
> Thanks!
> --Roger
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160531/d02494d3/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 18:45:32 -0400
> From: JovianMallard <tor at sec.gd>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never
> Initiated It]
> Message-ID: <7037ce20-8d4f-89b3-ffad-4bb269be9b6c at sec.gd>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Too much paranoia in this thread. Comcast's default wifi SSID is of the
> format HOME-ABCD where ABCD are 4 hex chars, I'd guess the last 4 of the
> MAC.
>
> If that's not this person's network, it's probably their neighbor's.
>
>
> Minecraft is only available from minecraft.net and maybe the microsoft
> store, not steam or origin. Someone else beat me to it, but it's trivial
> to run on linux - install java, run .jar with java, sign in, don't see
> sunlight for 18 months.
>
>
> On 05/31/2016 06:10 PM, Gumby wrote:
> > Minecraft is not very easy to install in Linux.
> > - @Percy - so why would */Tor accept /**/192.168.0.0/16
> > <http://192.168.0.0/16>/*be in your torrc? you don't have that address,
> > and I don't think the command is correct anyway.. anyone?
> >
> > Me
> >
> > On 05/31/2016 05:45 PM, Jim Electro House wrote:
> >>
> >> You said that your daughter installed Minecraft. Was it from a pirate
> >> website or an online store(Steam, Origin, trusted website etc.)?
> >>
> >> On Jun 1, 2016 00:27, "Percy Blakeney" <di99in5 at gmail.com
> >> <mailto:di99in5 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've recently taken her Dell out of her room and into mine. She
> >> knows the rules and ALWAYS grabs me before installing or
> >> attempting to install anything. The ONLY thing she successfully
> >> installed was Minecraft.
> >>
> >> As of two days ago I ran several network scans using different
> >> Android apps. I received the same result with each one:
> >>
> >> 10.0.0.1 Arris (router number ends with 23:04 which is correct)
> >> 10.0.0.6 arrisxb3atom (router number ends with 22:FC which is
> >> incorrect)
> >> 10.0.0.45 android port 111 rpcbind portmapper
> >> 10.0.0.61 inspirion port(s) 139 netbios-ssn smb directly over IP,
> >> 445 microsoft-ds
> >>
> >> Also, it shows my two (2.4GHZ & 5GHZ) secured wifi names and one
> >> xfinity network, as it should, however, it also shows HOME-E2DE
> >> 2.4, HOME-E2DE 5 and another xfinity network. Though I don't even
> >> bother contacting xfinity about this anymore, when I did in the
> >> past I was always, ALWAYS, asked the same thing: "Unplug your
> >> modem from your router." And each time I've had to tell them, I
> >> don't have a separate modem, I have the Arris router/modem combo
> >> that you gave me.
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Gumby <info at gumbyzee.torzone.net
> >> <mailto:info at gumbyzee.torzone.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Actually, looks like it used the 2.3.25 browser bundle. But it
> >> was through emule file sharing. If he is legit, and I have
> >> concerns, could the daughter download some old infected files
> >> - and was it network aware enough to spread and infect a new
> >> Mint/Ubuntu?
> >> New variant back to life, finding any network, shared or not,
> >> like the new ransomeware?
> >>
> >> Me
> >>
> >> On 05/31/2016 04:31 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> So what versions did Mevade, Sefnit, etc use?
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tor-relays mailing list
> >> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> >> <mailto:tor-relays at lists.torproject.org>
> >>
> >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tor-relays mailing list
> >> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> >> <mailto:tor-relays at lists.torproject.org>
> >>
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tor-relays mailing list
> >> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> >> <mailto:tor-relays at lists.torproject.org>
> >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tor-relays mailing list
> >> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tor-relays mailing list
> > tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> >
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <
> http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160531/1d9e7e6a/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:36:16 +0000
> From: Peter Palfrader <weasel at torproject.org>
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated
> It
> Message-ID: <20160601073616.GC14186 at sarek.noreply.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Mon, 30 May 2016, Christian Pietsch wrote:
>
> > Hi GDR!
> >
> > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:54:41PM +0200, GDR! wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 May 2016 15:23:24 +0000 "krutt at anche.no" <krutt at anche.no>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can't image a single reason why Tor should be configured to run a
> > > > relay without the system admins knowledge.
> > >
> > > Debian did this - I'm not sure if it does that any more.
> >
> > This bug is not present in current and recent versions of Debian.
>
> Nor was it ever, ttbomk.
> --
> | .''`. ** Debian **
> Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
> https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
> | `- https://www.debian.org/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of tor-relays Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1
> *****************************************
>
--
*A security is a process of maintaining an acceptable level of the risk.*
*Milica Đekić*
*Cybersecurity researcher*
*Twitter: @MilicaDjekic9*
*Cell: +381 63 1963627*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160601/cf716eee/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list