[tor-relays] Bridge Authority closure

Gumby info at gumbyzee.torzone.net
Thu Jul 21 13:10:51 UTC 2016


I run two lower bandwidth middle relays, and have been considering 
changing one to a bridge to provide for a different level and type of 
users. It sounds like this may only be a temporary bump in the system, 
so I will continue with my thinking. Surprising to see some of the 
recent changes, we never know what tomorrow brings.

G


On 07/21/2016 12:28 AM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>> On 21 Jul 2016, at 14:17, Sebastian Hahn <sebastian at torproject.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 21 Jul 2016, at 05:20, Me <info at gumbyzee.torzone.net> wrote:
>>> So what are we going to do when Green shuts down the Bridge Authority server next month? Will it have a serious effect, or will there be any apparent issues or slowdowns?
>> We'll have to act before that. We're currently looking for
>> a new operator for the bridge authority and a suitable hosting
>> location, which we will want to include in Tor releases asap.
>> For a while we will feed the data from the two concurrently
>> running bridge authorities to the bridge database for
>> distribution to users, then when Tonga (Lucky's auth) is shut
>> down the new one will have taken over. We will lose the data
>> about all bridges that aren't updated after the time Tonga is
>> shut off. This means fewer bridges for bridge db to give out and
>> potentially a drop in counted (not necessarily actual) bridge
>> users of Tor.
> Old bridges will continue to function after the old authority is shut down, regardless of whether they are updated to the new Tor release. So existing users of those bridges will be ok.
>
> Old bridges won't be able to send their details to the new bridge authority. So a Tor update is required on bridges, so they send their details to the new bridge authority. Then they can be given out to users.
>
> Also, old Tor clients won't be able to get updated bridge descriptors from the new authority, but as far as I know, bridge descriptor updates aren't essential for clients to continue to use a bridge. (I may be wrong about this.)
>
> Tim
>
> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>
> teor2345 at gmail dot com
> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
> OTR 8F39BCAC 9C9DDF9A DF5FAE48 1D7D99D4 3B406880
> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160721/261d6775/attachment.html>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list