[tor-relays] dns request capitalization, tor and unbound

Tristan supersluether at gmail.com
Sat Jul 9 14:04:08 UTC 2016


That's my thought as well. At any rate, not using a cache for DNS queries
would add even more latency to the network.
On Jul 9, 2016 10:01 AM, "Petrusko" <petrusko at riseup.net> wrote:

>
> It shouldn't affect unbound's ability to cache anything.  However, I
> personally think it is inappropriate to run a DNS cache on an exit
> node, because that preserves a record on the exit node of what people
> are using it for.
>
> zw
>
> Hey,
> I'm not an Unbound expert, I think Unbound doesn't log any DNS queries...?
> What I know is only statistics can be given with the command
> "unbound-control stats", only numbers are shown.
> In my unbound.conf, the only log config lines are :
> logfile: "/var/log/unbound.log"
> use-syslog: no
>
> And this /var/log/unbound.log doesn't exist on my system...
> Is there way to see DNS queries made by users ?
>
> For me, about privacy, it's not necessary a problem about "knowing what
> are doing your Tor users", because if it's not you, it will be your DNS
> resolvers... As read before, a lot of Tor exists are using Google DNS :p (I
> think it's lol about privacy!)
> So the bad guy will know the DNS queries, but he doesn't know who has made
> it (only exit IP is shown ?), so privacy is safe ?
>
>
> --
> Petrusko
> PubKey EBE23AE5
> C0BF 2184 4A77 4A18 90E9 F72C B3CA E665 EBE2 3AE5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160709/98592f99/attachment.html>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list