[tor-relays] which DirPort should be advertised ?

Tim Wilson-Brown - teor teor2345 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 5 02:01:49 UTC 2016


> On 5 Jul 2016, at 07:30, Green Dream <greendream848 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> See: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2016-January/040074.html
> 
> My takeaway is that there's little point to setting an IPv6 DirPort at this point. Clients will rarely connect to it, and relays won't connect to it at all. Furthermore, "In 0.2.8, clients assume that the IPv6 DirPort is the same as the IPv4 DirPort" already. If that's still true, might as well leave the v4 port advertised, and if a v6 client comes along it will try the (non-advertised) v6 port anyway.
> 
> It seems like all of this is in flux though. Perhaps someone can provide an update on the current progress.

In 0.2.8.3-aplha, "clients, onion services, and bridge relays always use an encrypted begindir connection for directory requests".
Encrypted beginner connections are made over the ORPort.
This means that in 0.2.8 clients no longer use any DirPort, and relays only use the IPv4 DirPort.
IPv6 clients and bridge clients use the IPv6 ORPort.

In 0.2.7 and before, clients and relays only use the IPv4 DirPort.
IPv6 bridge clients use the IPv6 ORPort.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160705/1b7839f3/attachment.sig>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list