[tor-relays] Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?

[Tim Wilson-Brown - teor]

> On 29 Jan 2016, at 07:20, Roman Mamedov <rm at romanrm.net> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 06:33:51 +1100
> Tim Wilson-Brown - teor <teor2345 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Tor already considers relays in the same IPv4 /16 to be in the same family.
> 
> Maybe a step further in this would be to autoextend manually declared families
> with all relays running on the same IPs of any relays in the family. Dunno how
> complex or how useful this would be. It could at least fix-up some outdated or
> missed declarations.

In Tor, or OnionOO?

Tor already does this using the IP address whenever a path is built.
If Tor added it on the relay side, then we'd bloat descriptors for no reason.

If OnionOO added it, it would save OnionOO clients some work.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B

teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160129/41d51996/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160129/41d51996/attachment.sig>