[tor-relays] Debugging my small relay

[Tim Wilson-Brown - teor]

> On 8 Jan 2016, at 16:26, Green Dream <greendream848 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Is there really a reason to continue running this relay, even as a bridge? It has a consensus weight of 9. Before the upgrade and subsequent fingerprint reset, it was only at cw 16. The mean middle probability fraction was 0.000103%. The mean on the read/write was less than half a kilobyte per second. It's not really being used.

A bridge exists to allow censored users access to the Tor network.
So its consensus weight and use by the Tor network aren't really relevant.

What matters is the bandwidth it can contribute to censored users.
The advertised bandwidth is 100KB/s, which is somewhat low for a bridge.
As far as I recall, 250KB/s is considered a good minimum for a bridge.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B

teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160108/74d2d7d9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160108/74d2d7d9/attachment.sig>