[tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

Greg Moss gmoss82 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 4 21:48:00 UTC 2016


Nothing logical about it. Thats all you get with shitty connection

On Dec 4, 2016 1:43 PM, "Rana" <ranaventures at gmail.com> wrote:

OK thanks, this is beginning to sound logical. What you are saying -
correct me if I am wrong - is that since 3 DirAuths gave me fast/hsdir
flags while the other 5 didn't and gave me poor weight, you believe that my
connectivity with the 5 auths is poor and this is the source of my trouble.

If you are right then there is no problem with my relay, no problem with my
ISP, and there is a problem somewhere between the countries, and this
problem hits specifically my relay. This last piece does not make sense to
me but who knows...

-----Original Message-----
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-bounces at lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of teor
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 11:34 PM
To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic
IP


> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 08:11, Rana <ranaventures at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 5kbit/s traffic and consensus weight of 14 after running for a month,
including last 9 days with the same IP and a Stable flag - you consider
this normal?

No, sorry, I explained poorly:

Your maximum bandwidth is as expected for a middle relay with a similar
config. The relay flags are as expected.

Your measured bandwidth is not, and indicates an issue with your relay's
connectivity to the bandwidth authorities (5 tor clients/relays spread
around Europe and North America).

Until you fix this issue, your relay will continue to be measured low,
because it can not sustain the traffic the tor network needs.

It has nothing to do with your IP address changing.

Also, it's probably worth mentioning that the Tor network prioritises
*client* bandwidth, latency, and security. There are engineering trade-offs
between these factors.

Using all available relay bandwidth is not a priority: we will happily use
less bandwidth to provide better latency or better security.

Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-bounces at lists.torproject.org] On
> Behalf Of teor
> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 10:52 PM
> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with
> dynamic IP
>
>
>> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 02:39, Rana <ranaventures at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For as little as $10.00 US there are VPS' with static ip's..
>>
>> Attn: Kurt Besig
>>
>> Well I kind o' like my Raspberry Pi that cost me $40 including box and
power supply and SD card and door to door delivery, with far more
horsepower and memory than needed for running Tor relay, and my free and
absolutely stable 1.5mbps that I want to donate to Tor courtesy of my ISP,
and my transparent Tor proxy and my hidden service  and my wireless access
point that lurk on the same Pi.
>>
>> This is not a good reason to punish my relay. Makes ZERO sense to me and
to who knows how many people like me whose relays are flushed down the
drain by the current DirAuth algorithms.
>>
>> I can think of many an Iranian or Turkish or Chinese or Russian
dissident who could use 1.5 mbps bandwidth to communicate with the free
world.
>
> Rana,
>
> Your relay is actually getting about as much traffic as a middle relay of
that size should expect.
>
> When you change the IP address, it takes a while to re-establish that
traffic, as it should, due to the reasons I mentioned in my original email.
>
> T
>
> --
> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>
> teor2345 at gmail dot com
> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
------------------------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20161204/e28a93ef/attachment.html>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list