[tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

[George]

On 12/04/16 13:39, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 04.12.16 17:54, Rana wrote:
> 
>> In short, if Tor Project does not want relays with dynamic IP, it
>> should say so and I would stop wasting my time.
> 
> What's with the entitlement issues? You are free to contribute to the
> Tor project, but if you don't have the programming skills or the wish
> to do so, at least don't complain about other peoples' work in such a
> hostile manner. Nobody here owes you anything.
> 

Woah.  I think this discussion got a little out-of-hand quickly.

Rana's point about the desirability of dynamic IPs is certainly
of-interest to a wide array of people. Raising it is a worthwhile
question or contribution in my humble opinion.

The point is worth a discussion and feedback. Not everyone running a
relay should be technically required to submit a diff when raising a
point. There are certainly software projects that are quick to reply
with that.... (ahem).

A more productive direction might be pointing point
https://trac.torproject.org/.

It's worth noting that replying to what is likely a common thought among
a lot of relay operators, you are not only replying to Rana, but to
hosts of people who stumble upon this thread from the archives.

g


-- 



5F77 765E 40D6 5340 A0F5 3401 4997 FF11 A86F 44E2

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20161204/78d3c9c8/attachment.sig>