[tor-relays] Exit relay funding

[Kurt Besig]

On 8/3/2016 10:13 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:29:01PM +0200, tor at as250.net wrote:
>> Absolutely. Most of the infrastructure we provide on that basis and it
>> is ok! The reason for running that exit node was that we believed it
>> would contribute towards a positive impact in many peoples lives.
> 
> Thanks for contributing while you did!
> 
> I'm remembering way back when I would mail all the people running relays
> to see if they needed anything. Then there was the phase where we got
> some funding for Moritz to do relay operator advocacy and coordination:
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/turning-funding-more-exit-relays
> and that push also led to some cool sites like
> https://compass.torproject.org/
> 
> Among all the things that we need to do next, I think getting a relay
> advocate / coordinator in place would sure be useful. I think there are
> so many things that we need, though, that it's going to be a while yet
> before we get such a person in place.
> 
> In the mean time, hang tight everybody, and let's continue to have a
> community who helps each other, and thanks all for your contributions.
> 
> --Roger
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
Well stated and thank-you, Roger.
I agree 100% with the need for a more 'visible' advocacy in this age of
headline reading and jumping to false conclusions for no factual reason.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160804/a53140c2/attachment.sig>