[tor-relays] Does Setting Up a Bridge Relay Disable the Browser?

[Kenneth Freeman]

On 09/07/2015 12:17 AM, s7r wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for this. But why do you want to run your bridge instance among
> the same Tor daemon as the one handling Tor Browser?

I don't, necessarily. I should explain that I've been running a
long-term relay on my 32-bit Ubuntu box (Anosognosia:
6473E357BEF916BB63DB589FC85FC9E981E1B0F8), wherein the Tor browser
functions just fine; the 64-bit Debian box is my test bed for messing
about, but it does seem flaky.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xDD79757F.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3129 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20150907/5fcd8d1f/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20150907/5fcd8d1f/attachment.sig>