[tor-relays] excessive bandwidth assigned bandwidth-limited exit relay

jensm1 jensm1 at bbjh.de
Fri Oct 2 11:14:02 UTC 2015


You're saying that you're on a 1Gbit/s link, but you are only allowed to
use 100Mbit/s. Is this averaged over some timescale? If so, you could
try and play around with the 'RelayBandwidthBurst' setting. Increasing
the Burst might help reduce the queue delay when you're near saturation,
assuming the traffic is not constant and you're not over-saturated most
of the time.

I don't know the measuring system, but I doubt that random packet
dropping with iptables will have a noticeable effect on the measured
bandwidth, as long as you don't drop enough packets to horribly degrade
user experience.


Am 02.10.2015 um 10:16 schrieb Dhalgren Tor:
> "So" indeed.  For the time that was under discussion:
>
> cell-stats-end 2015-10-02 00:28:54 (86400 s)
> cell-processed-cells 20220,420,72,18,8,4,1,1,1,1
> cell-queued-cells 2.00,0.25,0.01,0.00,0.09,0.10,0.02,0.00,0.00,0.00
> cell-time-in-queue 203,131,17,7,2832,6198,3014,802,21,26
> cell-circuits-per-decile 126717
>
> . . .horrible
>
>
>
> On 10/1/15, Yawning Angel <yawning at schwanenlied.me> wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:05:38 +0000
>> Dhalgren Tor <dhalgren.tor at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 3) observing that statistics show elevated cell-queuing delays when
>>> the relay has been in the saturated state, e.g.
>>>
>>> cell-queued-cells 2.59,0.11,0.01,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00
>>> cell-time-in-queue 107,25,3,3,4,3,7,4,1,7
>> So?
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays




More information about the tor-relays mailing list