[tor-relays] Determining geographical locations for a new exit relay would help most

nusenu nusenu at openmailbox.org
Sat May 2 21:37:04 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

>> You might also want to consider the exit probability and use that
>> in addition or instead of CW.
>> 
>> I don't know if VULTR has multiple ASes but if they do you might
>> also want to have a look at the group by AS results (if they
>> allow you to choose).
> 
> Thanks for the breakdown, that helps. The only hitch with the
> Sydney and Toyko locations is that instead of 1000GB/mo of
> bandwidth, you only get 200GB/mo.
> 
> Would it be better (all things considered) to go with the UK
> location at 1000GB/mo vs Tokyo or Sydney at 200GB/mo?

Is there a specific reason why you limit yourself to vultr?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=9Z5S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the tor-relays mailing list