[tor-relays] Multi-core Support

[teor]

> Thomas White:
> Have there been any updated ETAs concerning the development/support
> of multi-core for the core tor workloads? If not, is there anything
> in particular that I could do to speed the process up? Scaling the
> capabilities of the Tor process would be a huge relief and help for
> my upcoming project so I am keen to push it through should it be
> possible to bring up the priority list. t T
> 
> On 1.6.15 9:11, Tor-Admin wrote:
> I have to agree with that, multicore support is really important and
> should be on the top of the priority list.
> 
> On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:13:13 -0400
> 12xBTM <12xbtm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Improving multi-core support can allow users to saturate high bandwidth
> connections with cheaper processors, less setup, and just more efficient
> deployment of high-capacity nodes in general. Improving multi-core
> support should be a major priority.
> 
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:31:56 +0500
> From: Roman Mamedov <rm at romanrm.net>
> Sure but I doubt anyone contests that it's better to have multicore support,
> than to not have it. However that work doesn't get automatically done.

The work is currently listed in Trac in:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1749
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7572

teor

teor2345 at gmail dot com
pgp 0xABFED1AC
https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5

teor at blah dot im
OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20150603/6dad2783/attachment.sig>