[tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

[teor]

> On 7 Jul 2015, at 09:46 , josh at tucker.wales wrote:
> 
>> From the perspective of someone investigating abuse, I think it's
>> important that 'not an exit relay' means 'not capable of exiting on any
>> port at all'. Ergo I think your option c) is the way to go.
> 
> I also think this (c) is the best option. I agree that it's important to be able to determine, from an investigatory perspective, whether or not a relay was capable of exiting on any port.

And, if we are going to implement "Exit" as any port, it should also be *any* IP, not just an IPv4 /8 as in the Ext flag definition.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
pgp ABFED1AC
https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5

teor at blah dot im
OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20150707/2bbaf395/attachment.sig>