[tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor

[Karsten Loesing]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/07/15 10:59, Joshua Lee Tucker wrote:
> Hi Karsten,

Hello Joshua,

> I much prefer the design of the first logo (over the existing ones)
> - I think it helps to retain ExoneraTor's affiliation with Tor, as
> I think the other logos make it too difficult to recognise that Tor
> logo.

Sounds good, added to the mockup as pro argument for the first logo.
Let's collect more arguments and maybe even alternatives.  Note that
these logos are very quickly drawn using the "paint equivalent on Mac
OS X", just to capture the idea.  It's easy to make more drafts.  And
once we have a candidate, we'll ask a real designer to re-draw the
logo for us.

> The designs look great!
> 
> I have one suggestion:
> 
> Would it not be better to use a date selection component for the
> user to select a data? I think the current method of having to
> manually input a date, formatted in the correct way, is a little
> clunky (I think this is demonstrated in the fact that there's a
> design page with a data formatting error).

I also added that one as open discussion point.  Note that neither
Julius nor I are web designers, so we just didn't know how to add such
a date selector.  I guess the tricky part might be that we wouldn't
want to add a JavaScript requirement just for the date selection part.
 If you have any ideas or even patches, please send them here, and
I'll include that in the mockup.

> Keep up the great work!

Thanks for the feedback!

All the best,
Karsten


> 
> Joshua Lee Tucker
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Karsten Loesing
> <karsten at torproject.org> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hello relay operators,
> 
> Julius and I have been working on a design mockup for the
> ExoneraTor service for the past few months and would want to hear
> what you think about this:
> 
> https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/exonerator-mockup/
> 
> The main idea behind this redesign was to simplify the existing 
> ExoneraTor service by omitting technical details (e.g., Tor
> descriptor contents) and removing mostly unused features (e.g.,
> parsing detailed exit policies).
> 
> Please take a look at the design mockup, maybe compare it to the 
> existing ExoneraTor service, and let us know your thoughts.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> All the best, Karsten
> 
> -

> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays at lists.torproject.org 
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVlQKMAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCr29gIAIr1tlGlVL0d8ZWM4uf5iClb
ijkoVOf58rgScJqJd1rQQgNeDig7ZiFOsRytKIdtdIOoUwbsOrfSmRNc3RdYT7FK
z2IPdZP96alofFbL7rBcJTvu7sAJ8Mu532DyF6/hn7zxaPAqsLb+nM9zImUVpgfG
AloLmzWBcTffZbo5y6Ls8LxKuEl7I3oGTqk9AG/10zo+H5/kxtU39S4kUHK/54vz
2IPMugFtjhVWM6py7ppBPnR9A1Pozw9ZX9kXOj1pVBG9SeT73fEGTSJhdRb2nlZv
bqNumxvQBbUDAxb3jrw4Ggr91VNrjHB+CP9AMyyZV5Ajg8dYMme1Jxw5H3HB/IY=
=bJ5G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----