[tor-relays] Consensus weight dropped

[Network Operations Center]

What if one were to shut down the node for several days and then restart 
it. Wouldnt that maybe prompt the network to "rescan" the node?

On 31.01.2015 10:48 PM, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote:
> Hello List,
> 
> at this point I want to thank Bram de Boer for spending an unmetered
> server. Dediacted servers with unmetered network is not cheap and 
> should
> be treated differently as a virtual server at OVH.
> I can totally agree why he is disappointed about that.
> 
> Just deleting the identity is not a solution for me. The identity of a
> server is also a certificate of the spend effort. If something like 
> that
> would happen to my relays I would be out of here. Especially I'm not
> using Tor at all but want to help people who can not access the web 
> like
> I can do.
> 
> I recently tried to check why the consensus dropped by reviewing the
> votes data and digged into the source but my knowledge about that is 
> far
> below the average. So I hope someone with more knowledge is reviewing
> this case and post a solution or declare it as a general probleme and
> write a bug report.
> 
> ~Josef
> 
> Am 31.01.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Network Operations Center:
>> 2)
>> This link has been posted:
>> http://freehaven.net/~arma/moria1-v3-status-votes
>> which is a collection of all 9 BWauth nodes. Currently there is
>> nothing a node operator can do bar deleting his keys. Atleast no other
>> solution has been posted in this thread.
>> 
>> On 31.01.2015 10:23 PM, starlight.2015q1 at binnacle.cx wrote:
>>> At 21:51 1/31/2015 +0100, you wrote:
>>>> This has already been done.
>>> 
>>> Implicit in my post is that
>>> 
>>> 1) about 10 days have passed, so recent
>>> data is more relevant than the earlier
>>> work, especially an one BWauth operator
>>> stated his node should be doing better;
>>> and
>>> 
>>> 2) no precise mention of how to obtain
>>> the data was posted earlier and doing
>>> so might enable Bram de Boer to examine
>>> and track the situation directly.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays