[tor-relays] Consensus weight dropped

[Network Operations Center]

My dropping consensus overlaps exactly with the blue line on that graph 
time-wise. The 1 Month Graph shows this pretty well.

https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3D7E274A87D9A89AF064C13D1EE4CA1F184F2600

It feels as if I am almost completely dependent on that blue node, 
although since one needs multiple measures, it shouldn't be possible.

On 21.01.2015 11:34 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 21/01/15 06:03, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
>> 
>> On 21 Jan 2015, at 05:10, eric gisse <jowr.pi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Holy crap, 40%? And that's been historically acceptable?
>> 
>> I don't think it was historically like that.
> 
> Actually, it's not that bad:
> 
> https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/bwauths-2015-01-21.png
> 
> That graph shows that most relays have been measured by either 4 or 5
> bandwidth authorities in the past weeks.  Only relays with 0, 1, or 2
> measurements had their consensus weight fraction set to almost 0.  But
> it's far less than 40% of relays.  I assume that's natural churn in
> the network.
> 
> Seems like the two relays mentioned on this list have some other
> issue.  Ideas, anyone?
> 
> All the best,
> Karsten
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUv4C4AAoJEJd5OEYhk8hICKYH/21kTHfZ0pG0L/OiFBrbTFy3
> bNAPYeTa1AAJb0PHpweKn7gX9pBheKwCDzd36Nk8cWhkYJ/QmrumE2IXxoFTGT3L
> X++MCTxqtnN+XDqNlNdgyAfYVAk/jG7RtqxSzxDFTl3BSW18t8KwbOGokuWluAI+
> Zp7Oo33Rmvk3/Jmgc4Ht364esrLXyFpO2SBdGCzSLLtSkPATIMrnhBx5ruDpWGcg
> 4wD5tNzztfBfrc7vSVwJXLTfAmJOZmaH7nBRS8CRhOlQ9x6/FBW8unSf8bD75+O7
> mMep1/k2QJlTwbU9ydySgx4crwO1b5bLKOoD8kYme3TDM6qjZ5cpcETpiR01vUM=
> =CefK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays